will be all right? interceptions ... I wonder if what I read is true ... I'm afraid you
I quote .. The measure amended
The bill on government wiretapping gets the first go-ahead by the House Judiciary Committee and now it 's expected here on February 23, but only for the general discussion. The consideration of amendments and the vote will probably continue in March with the timing of quota debate. This, in brief, the contents of measure, as amended again tonight in the last review of the committee:
serious evidence of guilt - The PM may 'seek permission to intercept only in the presence of' serious indications of guilt '. In investigations of terrorism and mafia enough 'sufficient evidence of crime'. The request must 'be authorized by a magistrate of the college district capital. But the judge must 'then make its own independent assessment of the case.
VIA THE MAGISTRATE THAT SPEAKS TOO - The toga issuing "public statements" on the proceedings which he is given has an obligation to abstain. It must 'be replaced if the register of suspects to reveal the secret office. His name can not ' be named.
FAILED INSPECTION, STOP UP TO A YEAR - The bill provides for imprisonment for up to a year and a fine of from 500 to 1032 € for public officials and judges who fail to exercise "control necessary to prevent the improper publication or cognition interceptions.
public ban - For media inquiries will become a 'top secret'. will no longer 'publish the proceedings of the preliminary investigation, not even the inclusion of someone under investigation, or how acquired on file in the Pm or the defender until the end of the preliminary hearing. Even if the documents will no longer be 'a secret.
A NO NAMES AND IMAGES PM - The bill provides for a halt to the publication of images or names of judges "with regard to proceedings and criminal cases assigned to them", except that the image is not essential to the freedom of the press.
JAIL FOR JOURNALISTS - Back to jail for journalists. With two amendments approved at the last minute and 'planned punishment of one to three years for those who, "with the will' of fraud, public interceptions for which has been ordered for the destruction or" a conversation or communication flows on the facts and circumstances or persons foreign to the investigation of which has been prepared after leaving. " Also increase the penalties for publishers, up to 370 thousand Euros for violating public law obligations.
CRIMES - off point on the current law changes little. Can be intercepted all crimes with sentences of over 5 years, including those against public administration; insults, threats, wear, harassment, trafficking in drugs and arms-trading, insider trading, market manipulation, smuggling, spread pornographic material to minors even on .
eavesdropping - You can use the 'bugs' to spy only places where you know you are making activity' crime. The only exception to the crimes of the Mafia, terrorism and for those more 'serious.
time limits - no you can 'listen to more' than 60 days: 30 most 'over 15' 15. For crimes of crime 'organized terrorism threat by means of telephone or you can' reach 40 days and be extended by another 20.
PROCEEDINGS AGAINST UNKNOWN - Interceptions can be requested only by the injured party and then only on its users. The opposition disputes the fact that there can be more 'intercept in cases of sexual violence because' investigations requiring wiretapping exploratory 's identification of those responsible. Can be acquired but 'documents relating to the telephone traffic to see who was present at the crime scene.
ARCHIVES AND PROHIBITION OF CONFIDENTIAL MINUTES TO ATTACH FILE - Phone calls and related records will be kept in a filing with the Public Prosecutor. Prosecutors have the power to manage and control centers interception and listening.
BAN USE IN OTHER CASES - Interceptions can not be used in proceedings other than those in which they were placed. Except in cases of mafia and terrorism.
STOP A 'ONE DAY IN LOCAL COURT' - will no longer 'doing TV coverage in the courtroom, unless all parties agree
